reGeneration2

We have just come back from Lausanne, where we had gone for the aunch of reGeneration2 at the Musee de L’Elysee. Sylwia Kowalczyk, my wife, was one of the 80 photographers selected as ‘Tomorrow’s photographers today’, representing the best of the next generation of art photographers. Needless to say, I am incredibly proud of her, and went along to carry her bags and meet a whole bunch of inspiring photographers, many of whom I already knew through their photographs (for example, I had admired Kalle Kataila‘s photography at an exhibition at Loft Proekt – Etagi in St Petersburg).

The Musee de L’Elysee had a proper budget to give a really spectacular launch, flying photographers from all over the world and providing accommodation, as well as a programme of events, including a delicious Thai barbecque. We met many lovely and talented photographers, several from the Helsinki School who seem to be dominating contemporary photography. A particular favourite was Saana Wang, both for sunny and radiant disposition, and her intriguing photographs, which, like Saana herself, transcend the divide between Finnish and Chinese cultures.

Here are Sylwia’s pictures hanging in the exhibition. reGeneration2 is being published by Thames and Hudson:-

As you might expect, everything in Switzerland runs like a clock. The driverless trains on the city’s metro system are especially cool. Which makes you all the happier when you come across a little design flaw, proving that we are all human after all.

no comments

Nothing to do with photography

Has anyone else noticed the similarity between the way that David Cameron talks, and Pitt the Younger?

Here is David Cameron:-

And this is Pitt the Younger:-

Coincidentally – David Cameron just happens to be Britain’s youngest Prime Minister for 200-odd years since, errr…, Pitt the Younger.

show hide 1 comment

Love, hate and Ryanair

We just came back from a whole 5 days in Florence, yippee!

Ryanair isn’t an airline – it’s a game. The object of the game is to reach the destination as cheaply as possible, (preferably more or less on the day that you were supposed to). The Enemy has the task of trying to make your journey as expensive as possible.

The cards are stacked against you, because The Enemy gets to write the rules of the game and can change them when it wants to, just to keep you on your toes. Their strategy is to quote an irresistibly cheap up front price to hook you. Then throw every trick in the book to squeeze your wallet like a grape.

This starts with the obvious ruse of adding various unexpected charges as you go through the booking process, so that you’re right on the edge of cancelling the booking – but go ahead anyway. You’re probably forewarned about this and expect it, to a some extent. But usually the enemy has thought up a new kind of extra charge since last time you flew, and throws it into the stew on the very last page before you complete the booking. Booking fees, whatever the hell that means, are the most annoying. They undoubtedly piss you off, but you probably take it on the nose and go ahead and complete the booking anyway.

Why should I pay them a booking charge? It is me making the booking, I should be charging them for doing it. I have been daydreaming of sending The Enemy a bill for my own booking fee. Did I forget to mention up front my £50 fee for this? I’m so sorry Mr. Enemy, but it is in my standard terms of business. You wish to make a complaint? Of course, here is my Complaints Hotline (50p a minute, all our operators are busy at the moment, but please hold and we will answer your call as soon as I become available. In the meantime here is some information about our standard range of Complaints Fees, read veeeeery slowly). They’re not quite that bad yet, perhaps, but getting there.

That is only the start. Much of the battle goes on around the fraught subject of baggage allowance. The Enemy is hoping that you will try to economise by not paying for all of your hold baggage, that you think at the time of booking that you will get away with carrying less than you inevitably do end up taking by the time you get to the airport. Big mistake. They are counting on you changing your mind, or trying to sneak on a few sneaky kilos extra, or that your hand luggage will be 1cm wider than the allowance, or that you will try to carry your laptop separately, or have a camera on your shoulder, or that you will buy a few presents or books while you’re away for the return journey.

I know all this horror is going to happen, and I always try to find an alternative airline. I’m happy to pay more to fly on Easyjet or Wizzair, or any other airline that is relatively up-front about the ‘extras’. But as often as not flight timetables and geography mean that I end up coming back to playing the same old game with The Same Old Enemy.

Oh, and Florence? It was fantastic of course!

show hide 1 comment

Phew

Tonight’s absolutely fantastic news is that the orphan works proposals have been struck out of the Digital Economy Bill (see my previous post). It was taken out literally minutes before the new law was finally adopted by the House of Commons. Fortunately, many MP’s on all sides of the house had seen the lunacy of the provision, and the Conservatives in particular made their approval of the Bill conditional on striking out Section 43.

My faith in democracy is restored. Though it is a little sad that MP’s have a better understanding of the impact that the legislation would have on intellectual property than the Intellectual Property Office do.

Kudos to the organisers of the Stop43 campaign, many of whom are lights on EPUK – Editorial Photographers UK – for carrying out a brilliant information campaign to stop the draconian proposals.

To celebrate, here’s a picture taken from the bus this last Friday. As you can see, it’s been snowing here!

no comments

You don’t own your photos any more

The Government is planning to introduce a new law in just two weeks’ time that allows companies to use your photos without your permission and without paying you for their use. The law was proposed by the Intellectual Property Office, bowing to commercial pressure from publishers.

Instead of seeking the owner of the photograph’s permission and paying for use, publishers will be able to pay a nominal fee to a government body instead of the owner. To take advantage of this, all the publisher needs to do is say they couldn’t find the owner of the photo. In theory, they are supposed to do a ‘diligent search’ for the copyright owner – in practise, given the billions of photos online this protection means nothing.

What is more, the Government plan to pass the law without even debating it properly in Parliament! Only the Liberal Democrats have so far mounted any kind of convincing opposition to these plans.

Section 43 needs to be struck out. Click below for the “Stop43″ website:

no comments